Thank you for mentioning Gaddafi's benefits to his people None of the articles I have seen do that, but I'm not sure why you would bother to call him brutal. He seems to me to be much less brutal than the last few US presidents also the leaders of France, Netherlands Uk etal who have no compunction to kill tens of thousands of innocent p…
Thank you for mentioning Gaddafi's benefits to his people None of the articles I have seen do that, but I'm not sure why you would bother to call him brutal. He seems to me to be much less brutal than the last few US presidents also the leaders of France, Netherlands Uk etal who have no compunction to kill tens of thousands of innocent people in order to get the oil or metals or whatever it is they want from a country and proceed to lie totally to do it. You might want to talk to Diana Johnstone who wrote about this in her book about Hillary "Queen of Chaos" - she points out that an important Dutch person ( I forget his business or job) totally made up the story about Gaddafi planning to attack some protesters in his country, and France and the UK took it up, and without checking to see if any of the story was true (it wasn't) Hillary took it up and persuaded Obama to bomb the country. As we bombed, one million Libyans went out in protest against what we were doing and stood up for Gaddafi but we ignored that. BTW, that's one fifth of the total population of Libya which had a population of around 5 million. That is a pretty strong protest - I can't imagine one fifth of the US protesting about anything. Gaddafi was a good man and a good leader who was generous to his people and was also a good neighbor to other African countries. I suspect that is a major reason why the US and NATO wanted him dead.
I hope you will maybe contact Ms Johnstone and discuss with her what she knows, and then maybe you could tell the world a little more about our appalling acts in Libya, which as you casually point out are as God awful as the lies we invented to invade Iraq and Afghanistan. It's important to get this info out, because Africa is an area the US is focusing on and I think African nations need to understand that we are clearly not to be trusted in any way.
Thank you for mentioning Gaddafi's benefits to his people None of the articles I have seen do that, but I'm not sure why you would bother to call him brutal. He seems to me to be much less brutal than the last few US presidents also the leaders of France, Netherlands Uk etal who have no compunction to kill tens of thousands of innocent people in order to get the oil or metals or whatever it is they want from a country and proceed to lie totally to do it. You might want to talk to Diana Johnstone who wrote about this in her book about Hillary "Queen of Chaos" - she points out that an important Dutch person ( I forget his business or job) totally made up the story about Gaddafi planning to attack some protesters in his country, and France and the UK took it up, and without checking to see if any of the story was true (it wasn't) Hillary took it up and persuaded Obama to bomb the country. As we bombed, one million Libyans went out in protest against what we were doing and stood up for Gaddafi but we ignored that. BTW, that's one fifth of the total population of Libya which had a population of around 5 million. That is a pretty strong protest - I can't imagine one fifth of the US protesting about anything. Gaddafi was a good man and a good leader who was generous to his people and was also a good neighbor to other African countries. I suspect that is a major reason why the US and NATO wanted him dead.
I hope you will maybe contact Ms Johnstone and discuss with her what she knows, and then maybe you could tell the world a little more about our appalling acts in Libya, which as you casually point out are as God awful as the lies we invented to invade Iraq and Afghanistan. It's important to get this info out, because Africa is an area the US is focusing on and I think African nations need to understand that we are clearly not to be trusted in any way.