Because there is no law if there is no way to enforce it. It’s meaningless. Just as you said. One can argue semantics all day long. I stand by my post that for all practicable purposes that there is no “international law” and the use of that term is simply nonsensical with this latest genocide which no one is able or willing to stop. That’s how I figure it. And the UN is not international law, when a rogue nation like the USA can run roughshod over it.
Can we please once and for all stop using the term “international law.” There is no such thing.
How do you figure? The UN is international law, it's just toothless.
Because there is no law if there is no way to enforce it. It’s meaningless. Just as you said. One can argue semantics all day long. I stand by my post that for all practicable purposes that there is no “international law” and the use of that term is simply nonsensical with this latest genocide which no one is able or willing to stop. That’s how I figure it. And the UN is not international law, when a rogue nation like the USA can run roughshod over it.