Share this comment
Your comments prove that you are ignorant about ecology, agriculture, etc. You haven't responded to one thing I've said in this entire string, instead just complaining that you don't like my position. I'll leave you with this last question, and if you don't respond to it directly, we're done. I will say that if you don't read the book ou…
Your comments prove that you are ignorant about ecology, agriculture, etc. You haven't responded to one thing I've said in this entire string, instead just complaining that you don't like my position. I'll leave you with this last question, and if you don't respond to it directly, we're done. I will say that if you don't read the book outline to which I linked, you DON'T know what your talking about, and the outline is far to lengthy to repeat the outline here:
Someone is committing mass killings of humans, and that someone has enough support of other people to continue doing it. Is your argument against that someone that you want to compromise, that they should merely kill fewer humans? Because that's your argument here, except that it's nonhumans who are being killed. If you place humans above others, we have nothing to discuss because that's a totally immoral position. If you don't, please explain yourself. Do you realize that because of human overpopulation and wrongful lifestyles/overconsumption, that among other things humans are causing the Sixth Great Extinction, the only one ever to be caused by a species?
Finally, I have to rebuke your BS about killing people to reduce human population. I said earlier in this thread that, "[b]irthrates fall where women and girls are educated and empowered, and where the government mandates it, as China and Iran (temporarily) did." I never advocated killing anyone to lower human population, that's YOUR idea. I unfortunately get this a lot from anti-environmentalists like you, who worship their own species and have little or no consideration for others, because you clearly don't WANT to lower human population, so you resort to character assassination, trying to make out those of us -- who want much lower human population so that the rest of the planet has room to live -- to be some sort of evil monsters who want to kill people, which is a total lie. Lowering human population to an ecologically balanced level will take hundreds of years, it's not going to happen overnight. But if people resist doing so, they'll just continue killing the Earth and all the life here. You clearly have no idea what a proper human population was or would be, so again read the book outline to get that information.
Drop dead darlin....I don't read comments that begin with an insult about how ignorant I am. It's a sure fire sign of a patriarchal A hole....and likely an essentially unread one at that.