Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Shahid Buttar's avatar

Thank you for emphasizing the bipartisan aspect of the surveillance state. It is a crucial yet widely overlooked theme indicating that electoral politics cannot suffice as a solution. https://shahidbuttar.substack.com/p/fears-of-a-fascist-future-overlook

Before running for Congress against Nancy Pelosi and winning a primary in 2020–only to be silenced by a racist character assassination three months before the general election—I’d spent over a decade working at a series of nonprofits challenging both arbitrary mass surveillance (eg NSA), as well as racial & ethnic profiling embedded within the surveillance apparatus (eg ICE, FBI, etc). https://shahidbuttar.substack.com/p/closing-the-barn-doors-after-all?open=false#§corruption-hiding-in-plain-sight

In the 23 years since the Patriot Act was passed, there has never once been a transparent public debate about either the policy parameters for surveillance, its aggregate cost, accountability for recurring constitutional violations, or the vast constitutional harm reflected in the profound chilling effects that it has enabled across civil society.

One of the refrains I frequently repeated—only to be ignored by complacent Democrats ignorant of the dangers in which they made themselves complicit—was that restraints on executive power are crucial to deter and remedy abuses. The idea of the presidency falling into the hands of a maniac has never been far removed from possibility. https://shahidbuttar.substack.com/p/the-rise-of-the-fragile-tough-guy?triedRedirect=true

In fact, that precise fear was at the forefront of the founders’ minds when they wrote the Constitution. https://shahidbuttar.substack.com/p/a-constitution-in-crisis

It seems that the officials who take oaths of office to defend the Constitution generally don’t even understand it. It feels as if Congress is trapped in its own institutional idiocracy. https://shahidbuttar.substack.com/p/the-clown-show-in-congress-could

Expand full comment
Nancy's avatar

Important and thought provoking interview. Thank you, Ms. Webb, and thank you Chris for introducing at least some of your viewers to her. Can’t say the interview made me more hopeful, but it was a reminder that there are a lot of people out there doing important and constructive work, and that we cannot give in to hopelessness. I’m trying to tread water over the ever threatening hopelessness flood waters. I’ve said before that Chris’ columns and others are lifeboats in a sea of propaganda.

What Ms. Webb says about the “distinctly bipartisan” character of the erosion of our privacy by the U.S.’s two monopoly political parties is so true. Remember when Obama appointed Peter Thiel to a commission to propose changes to social security, knowing full well that it was Thiel’s goal to privatize the program? Knowing little about Obama when he launched his bid for the presidency, I read a lot about him in the mainstream media, before independent media had achieved the footing it has now. The Chicago papers in particular covered Obama’s active commitment to what he called “public-private partnerships,” and his support for what became the gentrification of poor, mostly black neighborhoods, one consequence being the inhabitability of public housing after wealthy landlords took it over under the public-private development plans. The developers of course got even richer. I worked for the federal government during Obama’s two administrations, and what I think a lot of people don’t know is that he privatized large swaths of the federal government. In my office, all the clerical support employees became contract employees, as did most of the paralegals. This meant they could not join unions and had very limited sick and annual leave benefits. A secretary I worked with could not afford, either time or money wise, to seek a proper diagnosis or treatment for a chronic illness, as just one example of those job conversions. According to an analysis I read at the time, the privatization cost the tax payers more money than permanent government employees, although the contract employees saw relatively little of it. The contractors got rich though. I think it’s fair to say that most of the wealth in and around DC is from government contracts. That’s where the waste is, too.

And of course the Fourth Amendment was further gutted under the Obama Administrations, with William Brennan lying to Congress, and hence the American people, about the mass surveillance of American’s phone records initiated on Obama’s watch. Now Brennan is a paid consultant for MSNBC, the Democratic Party’s press service.

Most of the information about Obama was available in the msm. It’s an example, I think, of the importance of doing our homework regarding candidates’ actual voting and other records instead of consuming the constructs curated by the parties.

I’ve always thought intuitively that you cannot have a democracy without privacy from the government and others in power. Eroding privacy flips the paradigm of government by and for the people to making us subjects with obligations to those in power. We have become the servants.

Expand full comment
31 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?