Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Niels Duus's avatar

I see this piece as a defense for the right to have crazy views.

I have no idea why Walker thinks Icke is worth supporting, or at least calling him "brave". I also read some of his works a couple of years ago, and found that his critique of the world order and the status quo in the West is somewhat on point, but that his explanations of how this has come about are not. At all.

It is difficult not to see the workings of the power elites as one big conspiracy. Conspiracies exist in real life, you can go to prison for being a part of a conspiracy, at least in the USA, so why is it so unthinkable that the most powerful people in this world should make arrangements about ruling the world behind closed doors? I, for one, believe that the elites are actually conspiring, at least sometimes, but not because of some ancient curse or whatever fantasy Icke talks about. On the contrary, most elites conspire for very worldly reasons: Because they want to stay in power.

What is happening in these troubling years is that the minds of most people have been altered in a way that makes conspiracies obsolete. When everybody thinks the same way, hates the same people, loves the same people, you don't need conspiracies anymore. What YOU feel is true IS true, providing you feel like everybody else. No need for a court ruling, perception IS reality.

I am pretty sure this status quo of the collective mind is NOT a result of some conspiracy views thought out in some back room somewhere, but instead a result of years and years of indoctrination by the media. Hermans and Chomskys account of the mundane causality behind this mechanism is still the best theory of how this came about. We don't need thetans or Illuminati to explain how the masses have been brainwashed. On the contrary, talking about angels or devils or Illuminati as determining agents of the unfairness of the world only gets you ridiculed, and rightly so.

Icke is a nut case, but even broken clocks get the time right twice every day. His explanations are crazy, but what he is trying to explain is actual reality. In my view Ickes theories are detrimental to what must be done. This is a class struggle between real people, not some cosmic battle between forces of Good and Evil.

Part of this class struggle is the very real canceling of everybody that does not follow what is now considered to be "correct thinking". What Chris is doing here is showing us why Icke is not to be believed, not because his thinking isn't "correct", whatever that means, but because there are other, less fantastic ways to interpret reality; ways that are more in line with the real class struggle. Icke has the right to have his crazy views on the world; Walker has the right to find these views "brave", and the rest of us have the right to criticize these views.

I see this piece as a defense for the right to have crazy views. Chris is doing here, what ought to be done everywhere, which is battling the texts you don't like, and their premises, by ARGUING, instead of just smearing the author, as has become the rule.

Greetings from Denmark!

Lynne Dempsey's avatar

Whew! Thank you Chris Hedges for reading this bizarre book on our behalf. I couldn't even get to the end of your column - the first time ever. I love Alice Walker. Maybe she just believes in free speech and thinks he has the right to express his utterly crazy theories. They are so preposterous that I can't see them damaging Zionists who have crazy theories of their own - such as that Yahweh, the God of the Old Testament anointed Jews the chosen people and endowed them with a piece of land - Palestine - and the inalienable right to clear off its inhabitants by force and persecute and imprison those who remain, many locked in an open air concentration camp. What a handy God! What a weird belief system.

49 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?