Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mark Ruffalo's avatar

Great show. Lots to think and act upon. The journey of spiritual purification before taking on this revolution really struck me. The dark night of the human soul, calls for it. We are in despair and grieving and it’s from this place that a spiritual doorway opens.

How do we want to live as human beings? Who do we want to be? What does it mean to be alive? Are we meant for what we are existing in?

The climate catastrophe will insist that we earnestly address these questions. We had the chance a decade or two ago to handle this turning with some grace, but what is left is that we will be dragged to it kicking and screaming. This is also often the nature of life. We learn the deepest things through suffering. That’s been true in my life. Suffering brings you to your knees, to the Creator’s level. The humility of loss and grief and despair, to your knees where the voice of the divine can be heard; there the heart is open and the mind is broken and the way made clear. Mankind is going, we are going to have to come to terms with this reality. That we are all going to die and that these systems we find ourselves in are not only unsustainable but also wildly dehumanizing and wildly out of relationship to the living beings and living systems around us, and our brothers and sisters we are here with.

I got to know Larry Kramer well. We worked on a project together. He taught me so much. Yes, he was enraged and yes he screamed “we must act up or we will die!” , but what drove all that and what wasn’t mentioned by Roger was that anger, and that strength came from his deep love of people, of his sexuality and the meaning of being alive. He was made free by his dejection, and alienation as a gay man in the 50s and 60’s. His suffering purified and brought him to the essential part of being a human being. Love.

It seems that is the God we are craving. That is the way. That is the purifying journey and that is what will carry us through the darkest and most brutal times. That’ ts what I know of Larry Kramer and what I know of Dr King. The love of creation and the fellow beings we share this planet with. Love is fierce and strong and clear headed, it is eternal and selfless and sacrificial. We only have to look at the way a mother is with her babies to know and understand where we should be turning and how we should be acting towards the impending peril that is already upon us.

This talk was very, very nourishing. Thank you to you both for having it. Thank you Roger. I look forward to reading your book.

Nancy's avatar

I don’t know how anyone with a passing acquaintance with the natural world could deny climate change. Right now there’s a heat dome in much of the U.S., with temperatures exceeding 100 degrees and smoke from Canadian wildfires making it hazardous to be outside. But it’s been noticeable on a physical level for a long time. We used to have four seasons where I live. Now it’s not unusual to experience all four of those seasons within a single week. And people have been dying from air pollution for decades. Of course it’s worse elsewhere in the world and climate induced migrations have already been happening.

I disagree with the professor Roger quoted as saying that the world will begin to notice when white people start dying. Only a privileged white person would say such a thing. White people have been dying for centuries (think, for example, of the predominantly white labor movement in the U.S., which of course was mostly white because persons of color were excluded). Many were killed, and they weren’t mourned for long, even by those whose lives they benefited. Does that professor honestly think that the Trumps or the Clintons or the Blairs or the Macrons or the Musks or the rest of the economic elites really care about the wellbeing of most white people? The attention might come instead when members of the upper middle class start to die en masse.

I agree with most of what Roger said and am in awe of his commitment and his courage. However, I don’t really understand the “religiosity” aspect, though I expect he’s talking about the non institutional kind. Could he substitute the word spirituality? (I think he would have said that if that’s what he meant). Maybe he gets into that discussion more in his book.

8 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?